Radical Idea: Forbid Advertising to Fix the World Climate Change

Any country which will forbid advertising on its territory will see its greenhouse gases emission diminishes for at least 50% in the subsequent years.

Because, the real greenhouse gas responsible for our environment destruction is from our mind, not from the cow ass!

In autumn 2013, I attended a European conference on innovation during the Council of Europe summit in Vilnius. One of the conference theme was “climate change and innovation”.

I was disgusted by what I heard. Over a thousand people were in the room, and the speaker went on with impressive conviction to demonstrate how climate change is an opportunity for business to innovate and make big money. He made a list of industries where solutions were needed, and how much billions dollars are to be grabbed.

The impressive design of the presentation, and the speaker passion about the topic aroused the room to full excitement, with rolling hands eager to fly back home to craft their next big business plan for big money.

I was not impressed at all. At the end of the session, I went to see the speaker and asked him if what he was doing was not similar to a guided tour of a war devastated country pointing to hunger stricken women and children as opportunity for the food industry, exalting the complete destruction of houses as opportunity for the real estate moguls, marking the under supplied hospitals and the numerous unburied bodies as huge opportunities for the pharmacy companies and the funerals agencies.

“Where is the hard thinking?”, I asked him, “why won’t you point out the causes and the responsible of the war in the first place, and like in the case of real innovation ask people to find a solution to the root causes?”.

“I can’t do that. The causes and the responsible of the war are beyond what we can do. We are a business focused interest group.” He responded

“What if business was the responsible of the war,” I asked

“well, I’m not sure where this discussion is leading us. Business alone could not be held responsible of the climate change. Business only responds to social demand, and the effects of business activities on society are therefore common problems not just the responsibility of business”. He responded.

“You know what, let forbid advertising, and you’d see that half of the causes of climate change and environment destruction would go away.” I said

“Wow … Wow … That’s impossible. How then people would know about products and companies?” he asked

“Let’s me ask you a question. When was the last time have you seen an advertisement for onions on Tv or radio? When was the last time did you see advertisement for potatoes on Tv or radio? Did people stop buying onions and potatoes?” I rhetorically responded.

“You mean, when it’s a real need, people would find out anyway without advertising!?” he commented.

“Yes” I responded.

“It’s a provocative point of view. I like it. Thanks for sharing.” He commented before we parted.

The hard truth is that the destruction of our environment happens first in our mind. And our mind is controlled by what is called an infosphere. Like fish in water, the infosphere of a society is the total amount of dominant ideas, thoughts, which actively shape the belief system, the way of thinking and behaving of the ordinary people and the aristocracy of that society.

In the same way, we are not instinctively aware of how we are breathing our surrounding air to live, most people are not aware of the infosphere their mind bath in, like fish in water.

If a society infosphere is polluted with destructive ideas, the people in the society would end up collectively acting in destructive manners without being aware of that, or worst rationalizing their wrongdoings in acceptable ways to themselves.

According to historically compiled data, the western civilization‘s domestic and outsourced production of greenhouse gases is the main cause and responsible of the destruction of the planet and the world climate.

Yet, the destruction of the environment and climate change could be seen by some as another cold blood opportunity, but the big challenge is fixing the infosphere which generates the destructive people behaviors. That’d be the real innovation.

Forbidding advertising would be a giant step in the right direction.

This might seem scary and impossible in the first place, but remember that in situation of emergency like wars, governments often intervene to ration food, commodities, etc.

Our planet is in an emergency state.

old-spice-advertising

Related Post

mm

About Mawuna KOUTONIN

Mawuna Koutonin is a world peace activist who relentlessly works to empower people to express their full potential and pursue their dreams, regardless of their background. He is the Editior of SiliconAfrica.com, Founder of Goodbuzz.net, and Social activist for Africa Renaissance. Koutonin’s ultimate dream is to open a world-class human potential development school in Africa in 2017. If you are interested in learning more about this venture or Koutonin’s other projects, you can reach him directly by emailing at mk@linkcrafter.com.

3 Responses to “Radical Idea: Forbid Advertising to Fix the World Climate Change”

  1. Maloo

    It honestly baffles me that advertising is as big as it is. I suppose it might’ve worked on me as a small child, but I really don’t remember ever seeing a commercial for anything and thinking, “I have to have that!!” I do remember as a kid thinking that ‘everyone knows’ ads are manipulative and usually full of lies, just like ‘everyone knows’ the same about politicians.

    I briefly considered a career in advertising, as I enjoy graphics and layout. In taking classes, I simply could not bring myself to use all the idiotic ‘tricks’ we were told were mandatory for a good ad, like the ‘call to action’ bit (“buy now!”). It felt deeply insulting to me and my audience. And it seems like everyone I know feels the same… they ignore commercials, flip past the ads in magazines, can’t close them fast enough on websites. And now on sites like Hulu (and many others) we’re given the impression that we’re supposed to enjoy ads and choose which ones we ‘want’ to see? I don’t get it. I’ve never met anyone that likes watching ads. Yet it’s one of the biggest industries in the world. Totally baffling.

    Anyway, point being, as long as it works, it’s going to exist. When it stops working, it will cease to exist. Gotta win over the hearts & minds of us lowly consumers first.

    Sorry for the rambling post, just had to rant a bit!

    Reply
  2. Bob Armstrong

    I visited the utter basket case of Leningrad in 1992 for one of the first advanced programming language conferences there after the inevitable economic collapse of the USSR .

    A couple of things made indelible impressions : the grandmothers by the metro stations selling liters of grain alcohol for a few rubles to get thru the night , and the absolute absence of advertizing . You couldn't even recognize a restaurant from the outside .

    If you want to ensure enduring poverty , follow the model of the USSR and ban all advertising . It's one of those capitalist horrors of letting individuals make their own decisions for the welfare of their own families .

    Of course it's no surprise that those who demonize the very molecule which , married to water by sunlight , is the building block of life would seek to suppress the welfare of the living on the basis of this ever more disproven fraud . That's why we call them watermelons .

    Reply

Leave a Reply

XHTML: You can use these tags: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <s> <strike> <strong>